Is it possible to find any common ground between different identities Research Proposal

Is it possible to stick any common ground between different identities in Turkey via Rawls theories - Research Proposal warningIntroduction Conflict has al vogues existed in society and it always will. It is an instance which is not directly a result or victim of any social phenomenon or occurrence, scarcely rather a combination of factors over time. Theorists have come to believe that contributions to an engaged, politically aw atomic number 18 form of multicultural theorizing may var. both(prenominal) light on political debate and public policy making. Not surprisingly, classical slacks such as Hayek (1976) insist that the contemporary liberal fixation on the mirage of social justice leads them to ignore the way that freedom depends on a decentralized market based on private property, the overall results of which are unpredictable. Similarly, Robert Nozick (1974 160ff) famously argued that attempts to ensure that market transactions conform to a specific pattern of holdings will expect constant interferences with individual freedom. No idealistic policy will address all of the needs of everyone, but instead will institute the greater good for society. A utopian society is the society that accepts this fact. A nation whose people are in riotous turmoil, such as Turkey, challenges this truth declaring clement spirit and human imperfections as unjust. Not only can human rights be violated, but also utilize to exploit or institute other agendas. John Rawls views human rights as being constructed by presumable people living together in a society. Rawls presents a more compassionate view of human rights, one with the greatest degrees of individual liberty and equality, while maintaining these rights for all. The state should distribute everything, including benefits, equally unless an unequal scattering would benefit the poorer classes. The work of John Rawls is absolutely central in terms of the nature of reason, equality, justice or pluralism. It in spired us to consider how his principles might actually enlighten political issues arising in contemporary liberal democratic societies. The values of a governing agency can contrast with the personal values of the people. In many instances, only the outcome can determine whether the decisions were the right ones. In some instances, none of the choices calculate appropriate. Regardless of the size or impact of the conflict, ethical decisions challenge the best of us, and the right thing to do may elude common logic. This paper will address cultural diversity in the Turkish society and the view of John Rawls view of justice as a political conception. 1.1 Multiculturalism Multiculturalism is one of the nearly controversial issues of social justice in liberal democracies. Government and financial entities consist of culture, environment, strategies, and traits. The level of set are reflected in a countrys culture. The most changing attributes are culture and traits. Cultures, traits and environments yield from time to time, but not so far as to lose their original attributes. According to Cheeseman, the side by side(p) standards should be implemented at all times (Cheeseman, 2010) Keep the peace and shape moral standards incite social justice and maintain status quo Facilitate planning and orderly change Provide priming coat for compromise 90% Maximize individual freedom Minorities increasingly demand recognition and in some cases special rights and these demands are demands of justice. The line of